Just bit of fun.......

5 of these 6 are pretty closely related although non are nestmates. One is a totally different family, can you pick the odd one out and how do you come to that conclusion? Just for fun pass the time.

middle one in top picture, no bronze on it ............

Good try David but .......nope

is the dark one at top too obvious .....

Beautiful, absolutely beautiful. Cast with envy lol.

David wrote:

is the dark one at top too obvious .....

Too obvious David pal, keep going

At a guess different beak and make up, the blue on left hand side bottom picture.

Regards.

I feel it is the blue Pied left on the top of picture one.

Not because it is older, but has a different stance … and some white of course. matbe a throw back, (If wrong) lol.

Still no one got it, although one comment hit the post.............
Unfair because I know, but someone will notice something different soon I'm sure

middle chequer bottom picture ..........nehu / whu ring ?? not gb ring .

David wrote:

middle chequer bottom picture ..........nehu / whu ring ?? not gb ring .

got it David, it's nothing to do with the rings, they're all same consecutive numbers too.

Spot a couple of differences to the other birds, sure you'll crack it now between you!

Think because all the others have been nominated it must be right hand cheq bottom picture but have no idea why.

Regards.

David is correct, middle cheq 2nd photo, but it' s not the rings issue, all rings are same batch.
I'll tell you tomorrow, but I reckon someone will crack it before then......

half right then colin, will get my magnifyer out ......

different distance colin, short / long etc ...?

barnie wrote:

David wrote:

middle chequer bottom picture ..........nehu / whu ring ?? not gb ring .

 got it David, it's nothing to do with the rings, they're all same consecutive numbers too.

Spot a couple of differences to the other birds, sure you'll crack it now between you!

Was never very good at school here etc Barnie I'm   spent more time in the corner to fill my time in & as such I wouldn't have a clue what the differences may be as such    .
& take care.

I probably wouldn't notice if I didn't already know, it's just something I can see in photos, misty hit post when he mentioned beak...........

cheq in the middle of pic 2 ...slightly different build and shorter beak ? nice ybs colin

that's pretty much it Darren, smaller, darker beak and if you look closely the rest have a tiny light colour tip on their beaks, this one hasn't. Also it's not so clear on images but this hen has darker pigmentation on its toes and shins, what you usually get with smokey blues, meaningless I know but just a bit fun.

barnie wrote:

that's pretty much it Darren, smaller, darker beak and if you look closely the rest have a tiny light colour tip on their beaks, this one hasn't. Also it's not so clear on images but this hen has darker pigmentation on its toes and shins, what you usually get with smokey blues, meaningless I know but just a bit fun.

We call them black feet down here etc Barnie . Was the first little secret (for success) I was told while at school here by the expert of the day there sucked it all in thou for the knowledge tree but in the end     it was all total bollocks as most theories are on average .