RPRA Sold Reddings

just read elswhere the reddings has been sold, and the rpra / staff are moving out this week into new premises , anyone know why they are moving, and what property they have bought , and if they consulted the membership etc .......

well i have heard nothing...the reddings is a listed building i think in a prime area as for letting us know i think they do what they want anyway...sound familiar ? yeah like all the others with noses in the trough they think they are a law unto themselves...why do they need a building at all or offices of any kind they have coped this last year from working at home mind you try and get any sense out of the one loft contact at the offices is like pulling teeth they could even up the wages for working at home and put the rest back into the kitty ,could never understand why offices are required,no doubt deals made with a developer for the reddings site but how much of it is down on paper

Went / tried maybe, to sale a few years back.
maybe the legistration prevented it then?!
Maybe they have gone back to the drawing board and made a few alterations to enable it to be sold now! Maybe!

thing is, if it has been sold, it must be agreed by the members ......its not the rpra employees decision to do as they please .

David wrote:

thing is, if it has been sold, it must be agreed by the members ......its not the rpra employees decision to do as they please .

Yes David apparently deal done.

Nothing in the BHW this week regarding same.

Nothing on the BHW Web Site other than saying it has been sold.

The lot running the RPRA have never bothered about the Rules, they are a law unto themselves.

Their may be a few questions raised and that will be that.

Gone on for over 45 years, that is why the sport is almost gone.

Be interesting to see what transpires.

Regards.

would be interesting to know how many people are employed by the rpra, what jobs they do, and what wages they get ...........also if their job is necessary.

something about this smells to me

The lot running the RPRA have never bothered about the Rules, they are a law unto themselves.

Their may be a few questions raised and that will be that.

Because the members have always allowed it. Apathy of the highest.

yes i think thats it daz, members complain to each other and between them selves, but it doesnt go any further, similar to our government they do as they please and know nothing will happen to them .

Daz wrote:

The lot running the RPRA have never bothered about the Rules, they are a law unto themselves.

Their may be a few questions raised and that will be that.

Because the members have always allowed it. Apathy of the highest.

yes thats it daz not many who would seriously contest anything with the rpra so they do as they please

I raised the matter of the number of staff several times.

The size of their pension contributions, insurance, trips abroad cars etc;

Does not matter when you are not paying the bill.

It is 45 years too late for fanciers to do anything now, has been too many back scratchers of those who should have no part in any sport, apathy and the inability to know chalk from cheese has been the norm for far too long.

Fanciers only become involved when they themselves become inconvenienced.

As I have said and asked several times, can anyone tell me just one thing the Council have done during the past 40 years ( the time some have been on the Council) that has been benificial for every fancier equaly ?.

No good moaning now.

Regards.

Yes Misty, Dave Allen - correct name spelling maybe - took them to court. Cost the members though as he won the case and the RPRA picked up the costs.

Daz wrote:

Yes Misty, Dave Allen - correct name spelling maybe -  took them to court. Cost the members though as he won the case and the RPRA picked up the costs.

Yes, Dave Allen did the right thing.

I was wrongly advised and chickened out or the top heads would have rolled and the sport would not be in the dire straights it is in now.

Blame myself constantly.

Regards.