The example I gave shows that a high percentage of fanciers wanted one thing but the Region delegate should vote against the majority
Very democratic. .
Having experienced some long serving Council members breaking every rule in the book, fabricating evidence and totally ignoring the most basic principles of justice, having a vote of no confidence against several fanciers wanting to change matters and expose what was going on, I have over many years attempted to get rid of them, they have done nothing whatsoever to improve matters for all fanciers during the past 45,50 years.
The only possible way is for all fanciers to get off their back sides, what happened at the AGM regarding the Hall report should open even the most optimistics eyes that matters need changing.
If the Council can get rid of fanciers on the Council who wanted change and expose the working of Council the membership can get rid of the whole Council on the same basis.
I won't hold my breath.
Regards.
There is the means of having a vate of no confidence iin the