New RPRA Rule 7b passed

A new RPRA Rule 7b was passed at Friday's AGM:

Think they had to do this David to comply with the Law David wether there
was a rule or not.

Regards.

sounds like what we heard misty, someone has been threatened ........must have been true eh

obviously someone upset over something, would like to know what

David wrote:

sounds like what we heard misty, someone has been threatened ........must have been true eh

obviously someone upset over something, would like to know what

If you are right David, then the whole membership should be made aware of the circumstances.

Under the Rule I could realy stir matters up and a few heads would roll.

Was a long time ago but has  bugged me for years and now people are being procecuted for crimes commited after they have died, Saville etc; and some are still alive and go back decades.

No one should get away with breaking any rule nor acting in an inapropriate manner choose who they are, and the Council have done more than anyone else over the years.

If it tidies things up and they get rid of the Clique there may be a slight chance the sport may survive.

Regards.

David wrote:

sounds like what we heard misty, someone has been threatened ........must have been true eh

obviously someone upset over something, would like to know what

Surely with all the current rules they have in place there etc David, they should have been able to manage the situation as such I suggest. 100 years & they have just seen the light type of thing, somewhat strange by my way of thinking here I'm .

yes i agree knackered, all those pagesof rules and regs, and nothing in there to cover abuse by a member ......might be just out to gain more power, just like our government .

whats happened at the rpra has someone been attacked surely its a police/criminal matter if so ,a ban is a given i would have thought for any un-gentleman like conduct surely

not sure really darren, i read on another group someone who works at rpra was attacked, wether this was verbally or physically i dont know......then i saw this statement about the new rule ......