Aiming to be prime minister

Boris Johnson has been accused of breaking Commons financial rules so many times it has become “a pattern of behaviour”, after failing to declare a 20% financial interest in property in Somerset within the required time limit.

Well looks like he is heading for number ten!
Just another disatrous act of foul play and he'll no doubt be there.

he could well be the next pm if it were not for micheal gove stabbing him in the back after Cameron left he may have had the reigns for Brexit ,gove is not to be trusted he sits on both sides of the fence

Gove is Murdoch's man. He told May to put him back in the cabinet,
Like that BBC political pest Laura K. Another paid via Murdock. Will never forget the audacity when interviewing Jeremy. Asked him 56 question. Ignored the answer and implied he meant something else.
Jeremy took her to task and related what she was implying and doing. Took his time and stated exactly what he had answered.
'Thank you Mr Corbyn' says she, then said there you have HE says... and completely went back lying he state he had said! You couldn't make it up lol.

In all proberbilty a DARK HORSE will take over the Concervative Party ( those consevative with the truth? )

Because the leaders in the battle will cut each others throats.


Matters not realy too much damage has been done regarding democracy for the general public to bother who takes over, and apathy will aply to voting etc; until ??????.


Regards.

Back to basics. Put in the Communist party.

they are all dark and shady Misty lol

Britain is likely to be offered a final long extension ending on 31 December after the EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, failed to convince the the bloc’s capitals that Theresa May has a plan to break the Brexit impasse.
A number of member states, most prominently France, along with Slovenia, Greece, Austria and Spain, remain sceptical about a lengthy extension, citing the risks to the EU of Britain behaving badly.

Well nothing new or surprising there then. Like I posted before. May wants council elections first. - worried though that there will be a land slide victory for Jeremy - New Tory leader and then a referendum in October under a new leadership.
You couldn't make it up eh!

by what ive read and heard recently, I don't actually think its the eu who are wanting an extension / delay, its our own politicians / mp`s who are wanting it so desperately, there end game is to keep us in the uk, regardless of hat political group they belong to......its our own side who are the traitors

I am with you, David, they are playing politics.


Doing all they can to make sure we cannot get out but pretending to do all they can to get us out.



The way Germany and France are going (DOWNHILL) along with other members should be evidence enough that we would be better out than in, if things go pear shaped within the EU then we would be the fodder used to get them out.



There is also the point that if we now stayed in we could be a real big thorn in their side, voting down every thing they attempt to do.


The local elections may be enlightening, I hope many independents get in.



Can see a shock if a General Election was held, too many conflicting emotions involved which can upset any predictions.


Regards.

Agree with both David and Misty.
Not interested one Iota what the public voted for, they will have their own way of what suits them.
Yes Labour party whistle a tune with hands in pocket etc.

But two, or three, things are, as far as I'm concerned.
The Tories are the party in power and they are the ones supposedly doing the job.
It isn't just T. May who is deciding etc. nor just the cabinet BUT the WHOLE PARTY!
Further they are trying to place a share, a big one if possible, to the blame on the Labour party. Whom in reality can't control any outcome.
The Tories paid the terrorist group a £billion to hold on and stay in power... They hence have a share in any outcome... Out come lol Sorry.

this is the problem daz, we have government / politicians who are mainly remainers, doing the negotiating with the eu, they are doing something they do not want to do, so its only natural they would delay, and sabotage things at every stage,

if my mrs tells me to dust and vac the living room, I will do it half hearted , but if she said go clean your loft out, I`d be straight there happily scraping out .........

' … but if she said go clean your loft out, I`d be straight there happily scraping out'.

Maybe May thinks that the E.U. ARE like a dirty loft... and the M.P. love living in a quagmire … of lies, cheating and self interests!
I see a few M.P. have made £42 million selling their properties … these buildings nigh all had 'Expenses Paid'!

the majority of them are only in it to line their own pockets daz, and a great number of them are also corrupt.....

You couldn't make this up … indeed one wouldn't believe it! However two more blatant pee taking and the Tories allowing. We are now losing a seat a the Euro's, so won't and can't have any say!

However, we will have to pay over a £100 billion when we leave ON top of the £1 billion- actually more, each month we are left dangling!


Never might blaming May, he's just one voice - laughed at and taken no notice of, vis her own Cabinet and the Tory party beside the Euro lot,

Sad state of affairs? Darn right, and yet the plebs with not a pott to pee in will vote for them again! Moreover, why? Because they say and believe stupidities like 'Well they are used to having money and know how to use it! So best we leave that to them... as to commoners off the street'!

But can't fill pot holes in the road ways! Can't put any extra money into the NHS - In reals terms less each year. Can't help the police funding, nor the Knifings etc. Took 40.000 police of the force - besides those retiring in last 8 years.
Fire brigade running on a show string. Just for starters.
Indeed makes that lying two faced, war mongering Tony Blair, the best Tory leader we've ever had lol.

Sounds awful familiar to pigeon racing Feds etc! Leadership,

halcanada wrote:

Sounds awful familiar to pigeon racing Feds etc! Leadership,

Lol

Do not misunderstand me, I love the female sex.


There are intelligent and the less intelligent amongst them just as with males.


However, it is undeniable that their natural behaviour and position in life cannot be comparable to that of males, not less nor more but different.


The problems we have can be put down to the breakdown of the family unit.


Mothers have to go out to work, because they want everything at once, where it was the case of saving and waiting.


Children do not get the life they are entitled to in a so called civilised society.


Drugs are being used by people from all walks of life , just read the news, a very good example for their children.


Etc; Etc;


What has this got to do with the present situation regarding Brexit?.


Just look at certain members of the female sex sat in the seats of Government should prove the answer.



Regards.

Just as most males can dig trenches faster and deeper than most Females, females are way above males in the dealing with babes etc. Yes if a male, sadly for whatever reason, has to bring up a baby, then he will gain the ability too.
Intelligence wise there are and is no difference in brain power.
Yes a male is more adapt to making decisions... against the woman's ruled often by the heart desires.
However too many males also place themselves in debt via hearts desire... but that starts off as a wanton act.

Females? Child bearing. Servants. Slaves. What would males do without them? Make their own tea and cook? Disaster! Unfortunately they do not want to be subserviant! Oh dear!

Every animal species appear to get along very nicely by males and females carrying out their intended roles,
go against nature and you have problems.

If the roles were not intended to be different, then all would be the same.


The role of a male is to love and protect and earn a living for the family, the role of a female is to look after the children and their ( I nearly said BETTER HALVES) partners.


I agree there are instances where this is not possible but it does not change the basic facts.



Regards.

Well, no disrespect at all regards your thesis Misty.  Kind of smacks though of a Male chauvinism.

Different purposes yes. Woman (Eve) was created as a companion for Adam. Not as a lesser vessel!
But as a helper, and Adam as a provided. Both to love each other as their own body! Both having an equal role of importance to play.  Each compromise's the other for a better relationship.
Fine and right. Never seen a male breastfeed yet. Never seen a male have a baby.
But even with artificial insemination, it takes two to make an offspring. Two males, like two females, can't produce offspring.
Now when a parent loves their kids, they won't have been able to if not for the two sexes combined.
Are we, or is one saying, that one is more important than the other! of course not?
Yes, the woman is to be in the subjection of the male. The male to treat the woman as a weaker vessel. True. Both to love and cherish the other half. Yes because they become ONE!
But in no way does that mean one sex is of a better status, or the other a lesser person. Simply is not true.

Never said or implied that one was better than the other, what I did say was they were created for different roles.


Clearly and un ambiguously in the record of creation.



Mans roll, woman's roll.



Regards.

Both bleed and hurt. Both love and have elations etc. But best ids when both share joys, their roles together. All have needs.

So Misty you are right in saying one was created to have differences, that compliment each other.