RPRA and the Queen.....

as we all know the queen is patron of the rpra......with accusations coming out about her son prince Andrew`s preference for under aged girls, is it right we should be associated with such people......???

any thoughts...?

Come on!!!! One maybe bad apple the whole family is at fault? Get real!!

will he get the same treatment as chad evans

David wrote:

as we all know the queen is patron of the rpra......with accusations coming out about her son prince Andrew`s preference for under aged girls, is it right we should be associated with such people......???

any thoughts...?

its only accusations so far, if things develop that's diffrent but think
your jumping the gun

this certain accusation is not new, its several years ago it happened, its only been brought into the news because prince Andrews friend, pedophile Jeffrey epstien is been prosecuted yet again and Andrews name appears as one of the people who used the girls services.......and as it happens epstien and the government/royals/baristers are all running round like headless chickens, because in my view hes guilty as sin.

this is not the first time accusations against royals has come out, Andrews brother was accused of fiddling with young boys years ago, plus lord mountbattern was a known pedophile, same as ted heath and many more.....

also the royals had a very special relationship with jimmy saville.............as yourself why

im afraid theres more than one bad apple hal.

halcanada wrote:

Come on!!!! One maybe bad apple the whole family is at fault? Get real!!

get real ffs hal do yer homework theirs a good chap ...the royal lofts were asked to participate in a pigeon documentary about the history of pigeon racing and declined also a dickin medal on loan at the rpra was sold and plenty of in-fighting has gone on of late costing us the members and dragging the sport through the mire ....no we don't need this and would be better suited by a independent governing body with real pigeon men at the helm instead of a bunch of milkers who are more interested in mbe or obe for donations to charities with our money ffs ...now don't get me wrong here I am all for donating to charities once we have our own house in order otherwise we wont be able to donate feck all in the near future ...all money at present should be thrown into the raptor problem through the European court of law but of course the opponent also has royal patronage (rspb) so conflicting interests for sure so irrespective of the accusations of our amorous prince whether founded or not I think the royal in the rpra is a bit outdated now and its time to move on and get with the times but its probably too late now but better to go down with a fight I don't think the queen has much interest it was her father king George god bless him ...I have nowt against the queen or the royal family apart from the milkers and hangers on

Well Said .

killer wrote:

Well Said .

    Bring on the Republic system "ASAP" I say. Those Scots     may have been wary to walk the plank    . Myself !!!, I would leed the charge to be rid of all those royals etc down here. Dangerous territory now ???     I suspect, but I have to say     a bunch of inbred misfits by what history tells us all & the best thing they ever did by us     was send the cream of the crop our way, 200 odd years ago.  
*****

The Royals are redundant. All I am pointing out is this. One cannot have guilt just by association. Do not talk with Aussies! They were all criminals years ago! Germans are sadistic and will gas you! Etc etc,. One should not follow the Masses. Quite often the M is silent.

there is a law in the uk hal called the joint enterprise law, which is guilt by association.....many are in prison due to it.  

personally I think liz and phil should be hung, drawn and quartered, then the offspring should all be relieved of all their posessions and wealth and be turfed out onto the streets to fend for them selves JMO

ha ha

David wrote:

there is a law in the uk hal called the joint enterprise law, which is guilt by association.....many are in prison due to it.  
personally I think liz and phil should be hung, drawn and quartered, then the offspring should all be relieved of all their posessions and wealth and be turfed out onto the streets to fend for them selves  JMO

Upset are we David Not on the new year's honours list etc I take it.

yes knackered, a bit disappointed I wasn't made a sir, lord or baron for services to the pigeon fancy.......maybe next year eh ?

Not all were Convicts that were sent out ;just my line ?lol

probably sent there in those days for stealing a loaf of bread killer eh.........

David wrote:

yes knackered, a bit disappointed I wasn't made a sir, lord or baron for services to the pigeon fancy.......maybe next year eh ?  

Just to make you happy David  I here by appoint you etc Sir David of the pigeon world       & as an appreciation of all your work, I crown you with a bucket of wet pigeon s**t to mark the occasion & make your day complete .

David wrote:

as we all know the queen is patron of the rpra......with accusations coming out about her son prince Andrew`s preference for under aged girls, is it right we should be associated with such people......???

any thoughts...?

kiss your knighthood good bye ,and there will not be a peerage either

Knackered wrote:

David wrote:

yes knackered, a bit disappointed I wasn't made a sir, lord or baron for services to the pigeon fancy.......maybe next year eh ?  

Just to make you happy David  I here by appoint you etc Sir David of the pigeon world       & as an appreciation of all your work, I crown you with a bucket of wet pigeon s**t to mark the occasion & make your day complete .

thank you knackered, I feel a lot better now......I will be walking tall with an air of superiority from now on

klausey wrote:

David wrote:

as we all know the queen is patron of the rpra......with accusations coming out about her son prince Andrew`s preference for under aged girls, is it right we should be associated with such people......???

any thoughts...?

kiss your knighthood good bye ,and there will not be a peerage either

would you say I`ve blown it then john.....?  

David wrote:

klausey wrote:

David wrote:

as we all know the queen is patron of the rpra......with accusations coming out about her son prince Andrew`s preference for under aged girls, is it right we should be associated with such people......???

any thoughts...?

kiss your knighthood good bye ,and there will not be a peerage either

would you say I`ve blown it then john.....?  

I don't think you need to practice kneeling or getting the dinner suite pressed

David wrote:

klausey wrote:

David wrote:

as we all know the queen is patron of the rpra......with accusations coming out about her son prince Andrew`s preference for under aged girls, is it right we should be associated with such people......???

any thoughts...?

kiss your knighthood good bye ,and there will not be a peerage either

would you say I`ve blown it then john.....?  

cream tea and scones could still be on david

don't know about rpra and the Queen was talking to Ray Harris yesterday who is in court on the 12th jan. against the manager and the rpra what a mess this is

I don't understand what all this is about George, ive read alsorts of theories and info on different pigeon forums but still are no wiser.....as far as im aware it all started because two long serving rpra employees made an official complaint against the manager, one if not both being a female, so its very suspect as to why all this has blown up into court cases........

it seems people have lost sight of the original complaint.

could be right think maybe some questions were being asked and no answers coming back

it seems the manager has got his job back lol