2021 Racing

Bill Clinton ... Estimate over 200 rapes! Lauder money big time with misses. Still earning $billions of dollar with Russia Plutonium etc. and much more.
Hilary in Housing scams. Molesting kids. Raping a 12 yea old etc. (Chelsea, a daughter) the product of 'Office sex' ..../ not the white house etc. lol, Or Billy Clington, but in the work place... A law firm at that! ! Court cases pending lol... like Thatcher and co, will never happen.
In charge of troops , as Barracka, Bush etc. of killing civilianising high streets.
Bush Jnr and Obama both fined $5000 each for war crimes... just the tip of the Ice Berg!

exactly daz, if trump as much as sneezes hes evil, and a no good, yet we dont hear about obama, bush and clintons actions on the evening news, its all kept very hush hush .

Daz wrote:

Bill Clinton ... Estimate over 200 rapes! Lauder money big time with misses. Still earning $billions of dollar with Russia Plutonium etc. and much more.
Hilary in Housing scams. Molesting kids. Raping a 12 yea old etc. (Chelsea, a daughter) the  product of 'Office sex' ..../ not the white house etc. lol, Or Billy Clington, but in the work place... A law firm at that! ! Court cases pending lol... like Thatcher and co, will never happen.
In charge of troops , as Barracka, Bush etc. of killing civilianising high streets.
Bush Jnr and Obama both fined $5000 each for war crimes... just the tip of the Ice Berg!

If the above is able to be substanciated then I am sure even the most backward country would object and take legal action.

Although we have our own criminals running around there is no bunch  as bad as Blaire and his cronies, thousand killed and a country in turmoil because of his lies, so we should deal with our own criminals before worrying about others.

Blairs wife is not a good example nor their sons.

She a money mad individual and the sons hideaways when the fighting started.

Trouble is if all those who have commited a crime were inside. there would be more inside than outside.

Regards.

blairs a pervert, who propositioned men in toilets, his wife is as bad as he is, a barrister who is well known for representing pedophiles .

Yes David and Mendlesons a nice BOY too.

Government and the Law along with the Television full of them and  many calling the tune.

Regards.

there is a full list of them misty, mendleson, being one of them ........others are janner, heath (when he was alive,) leon briton, etc etc plus not forget our royals, who seemed to be frequently involved with people like saville and epstien

David wrote:

exactly daz, if trump as much as sneezes hes evil, and a no good, yet we dont hear about obama, bush and clintons actions on the evening news, its all kept very hush hush .

One could suggest thou David maybe in some ways Trump is unique in certain ways to the others mentioned above as such. He stands alone & condemned totally from my perspective here for his management of the corona issue pandemic there. Which is now over the 400,000 dead mark the last time I looked under his watch & I could also suggest he hasn't given a rats **** about any of them sadly or the trauma he has unfortunately brought to their families.

David wrote:

there is a full list of them misty, mendleson, being one of them ........others are janner, heath  (when he was alive,) leon briton, etc etc plus not forget our royals, who seemed to be frequently involved with people like saville and epstien

Yes David and the reason they are not held to account is because those who could are just as bad.

Think it all arrises from the Dormitories in the Univercities a lot of nice boys all together have to watch each others backs. (and possibly fronts).

Most of the Church leaders ( Church of England) are ????? in my opinion do not think any of them understand what Christianity is all about.

If we were aware of half that goes on I think there would be an uprising.

Regards.

Knackered wrote:

David wrote:

exactly daz, if trump as much as sneezes hes evil, and a no good, yet we dont hear about obama, bush and clintons actions on the evening news, its all kept very hush hush .

One could suggest thou David maybe in some ways Trump is unique in certain ways to the others mentioned above as such. He stands alone & condemned totally from my perspective here for his management of the corona issue pandemic there. Which is now over the 400,000 dead mark the last time I looked under his watch & I could also suggest he hasn't given a rats **** about any of them sadly or the trauma he has unfortunately brought to their families.

personally i think trump has been the best us president since kennedy .......

MISTY wrote:

David wrote:

there is a full list of them misty, mendleson, being one of them ........others are janner, heath  (when he was alive,) leon briton, etc etc plus not forget our royals, who seemed to be frequently involved with people like saville and epstien

Yes David and the reason they are not held to account is because those who could are just as bad.

Think it all arrises from the Dormitories in the Univercities a lot of nice boys all together have to watch each others backs. (and possibly fronts).

Most of the Church leaders ( Church of England) are ????? in my opinion do not think any of them understand what Christianity is all about.

If we were aware of half that goes on I think there would be an uprising.

Regards.

exactly misty, the whole system is corrupt, and not just the uk, and yes, if the people did know what was going on, there would be public lynchings in the streets.........what does occasionally come to light is just the tip of the iceberg .
this is why our government make certain laws, to protect threm selves, plus they have their own private army protecting them.........the police

Old pals act, and all bed mates.
Intent on fleecing the workers to evaluate more wealthy, whilst they deem, and are, untouchables.

Yes, it is not the actual system that is wrong its the reptiles involved in administering it using and abusing it  behind the publics back and covering up for each other.

Regards.

Did you know, Hilary Clinton wrangled it that a office so called mate, was accuse of the Rape she did. He was sentence to jail. But with an uproar and on appealed was acquitted!
Some monster that eh!

Thatcher followed her in firstly making a law stating if one for closed on a house that they couldn't afford any longer, they were still libel for the interest that the 'Loaner' would have received if carried through!

Then made easy terms for those 'Lower earners' to be able to attain a mortgage!

then threw thousand out of work and hiked the interest rate beyond any able to pay. Houses were bought then at a pittance! Interests still demanded.

Sound familiar? Yes her friend the 'Evil one' followed suit! Plus Thatcher took the money paid to buy and put in her coffers! Councils didn't get a penny! FACT! Then threw thousand out of work! Raised the mortgage rates to between 16% and 18% and thousands a day lost their homes!
Formed 'Housing Associations' with her friends who bought the Unfortunate peples homes to rent at give away prices.

Many then had to declare bankruptcy to stop paying the interest!
Never know who was the most evil and wicked between her and Churchill!

A right-wing authoritarian military dictatorship ruled Chile for seventeen years, between September 11, 1973 and March 11, 1990. The dictatorship was established after the democratically-elected socialist government of Salvador Allende was overthrown in a US-backed coup d'état on 11 September 1973. During this time, the country was ruled by a military junta headed by General. The military used the alleged breakdown of democracy and the economic crisis that took place during Allende's presidency to justify its seizure of power. The dictatorship presented its mission as a 'national reconstruction'. The coup was the result of multiple forces, including pressure from conservative and women's groups, certain political parties, union strikes and other domestic unrest, as well as international factors. According to an article written by lifelong CIA operative Jack Devine, although it was widely reported that the CIA was directly involved in orchestrating and carrying out the coup, subsequently released sources suggest a much reduced role of the US government.

The regime was characterized by the systematic suppression of political parties and the persecution of dissidents to an extent unprecedented in the history of Chile. Overall, the regime left over 3,000 dead or missing, tortured tens of thousands of prisoners, and drove an estimated 200,000 Chileans into exile.

The Catholic Church, which at first expressed its gratitude to the armed forces for saving the country from the horrors of a "Marxist dictatorship" became, under the leadership of Cardinal Raúl Silva Henríquez, the most outspoken critic of the regime's social and economic policies.
The Catholic Church was symbolically and institutionally powerful within Chile. Domestically, it was the second most powerful institution, behind Pinochet's government. While the Church remained politically neutral, its opposition to the regime came in the form of human rights advocacy and through the social movements that it gave a platform to. It achieved this through the establishment of the Cooperative Committee for Peace in Chile (COPACHI) and Vicariate of Solidarity. COPACHI was founded by Cardinal Raul Silve Henriquez, Archbishop of Santiago, as an immediate response to the repression of the Pinochet regime. It was apolitical in a spirit of collaboration rather than conflict with the government.
Britain's initial reaction to the overthrowing of Allende was one of caution. The Conservative government recognised the legitimacy of the new government, but didn't offer any other declarations of support.
Under the Labour government of 1974-79, Britain's relations with Chile were cordial, if not close. While Britain regularly condemned the junta at the United Nations for its human rights abuses, bilateral relations between the two were not affected to the same degree. Britain formally withdrew its Santiago ambassador in 1974, however reinstated the position in 1980 under the Margaret Thatcher government.

The economic policies espoused by the Chicago Boys and implemented by the junta initially caused several economic indicators to decline for Chile's lower classes.[ Between 1970 and 1989, there were large cuts to incomes and social services. Wages decreased by 8%. Family allowances in 1989 were 28% of what they had been in 1970 and the budgets for education, health and housing had dropped by over 20% on average. The massive increases in military spending and cuts in funding to public services coincided with falling wages and steady rises in unemployment, which averaged 26% during the worldwide economic slump of 1982–85 and eventually peaked at 30%.
In 1990, the LOCE act on education initiated the dismantlement of public education.
Yes! Thatcher praised and stated what a wonderful man and leader was Augusto Pinochet! Giving him shelter and means of not being held responsible for his crimes. Held a party in his honour! where stating, such as, a great leader was to be honoured and followed as he stood up for what is, and was right.
Although they never met in power, Thatcher was impressed by the success of Chile’s neoliberal economic program and Pinochet’s bloody stance against communism in sending him a bottle of the finest Whiskey! … Mrs Thatcher is the first British prime minister to convey the very strong impression that she could, in suitably fraught circumstances, very comfortably play the role of a Pinochet […] of course in the name of democracy, freedom, law and order, the struggle against subversion and the defence of the constitution.
It was reported in Chile that Britain sent over US$160 million worth of weapon to Chile. Thatcher was a staunch supporter of Pinochet long after both leaders had left power: 'today I break my self-denying ordinance and for a very good reason - to express my outrage at the callous and unjust treatment of Senator Pinochet', Thatcher stated in 1999.

Daz wrote:

Did you know, Hilary Clinton wrangled it that a office so called mate, was accuse of the Rape she did. He was sentence to jail. But with an uproar  and on appealed was acquitted!
Some monster that eh!

Thatcher followed her in firstly making a law stating if one for closed on a house that they couldn't afford any longer, they were still libel for the interest that the 'Loaner' would have received if carried through!

Then made easy terms for those 'Lower earners' to be able to attain a mortgage!

then threw thousand out of work and hiked the interest rate beyond any able to pay. Houses were bought then at a pittance! Interests still demanded.

Sound familiar? Yes her friend the 'Evil one' followed suit! Plus Thatcher took the money paid to buy and put in her coffers! Councils didn't get a penny! FACT!  Then threw thousand out of work! Raised the mortgage rates to between 16% and 18% and thousands a day lost their homes!
  Formed 'Housing Associations' with her friends who bought the Unfortunate peples homes to rent at give away prices.

Many then had to declare bankruptcy to stop paying the interest!
Never know who was the most evil and wicked between her and Churchill!

how true daz well said

The government has quietly introduced a loophole to its eviction ban that waters down protections for people who lost their jobs during the pandemic.
Ministers on Friday announced that they were extending the ban on bailiff evictions that has been in place since the first lock down in March, covering most tenants for another six weeks.
But the announcement did not mention a key change snuck out in legislation that will for the first time give landlords the power to evict people for not paying their rent during lockdown.
Since September the eviction ban has allowed landlords to go ahead with evictions in exceptional circumstances, such as when tenants are behaving anti-socially or were sitting on extreme levels of rent arrears.
These "substantial" rent arrears were previously defined in law as equivalent to nine months' rent, but debt accrued since the first lock down on 23 March was not allowed to be counted in the total.
This rule was to make sure people who lost their jobs during the pandemic were not made homeless because the government had forced their workplace to close.
But the new legislation published on Friday removes this protection and redefines "substantial arrears" to cover many more people.
Now, a tenant can be evicted if they have been unable to pay their rent for just six months, and most crucially, rent accrued since the pandemic began is no longer excluded.
The charity Citizens Advice estimates that around half a million tenants are in arrears, with the average amount owed being £730.
Housing activists warned that the new loophole leaves in tatters the government's promise that no one will lose their home because of the pandemic.
“The Government promised repeatedly that no one would lose their homes because of the pandemic. Clearly, they lied."
Alva Gotby, organiser at the London Renters Union
“The Government has sneaked out this desperately cruel legislation on a Friday night. Clearly they’re ashamed - and they should be," said Alva Gotby, a renter and an organiser with the London Renters Union.
“If people are forced out of their homes, the virus will spread. Everyone is making enormous sacrifices to get transmissions down, yet, shockingly, the Government has chosen to prioritise the profits of landlords over our lives."
She called for the government to again halt all evictions and write off debt that renters had built up during the pandemic, adding: “The Government promised repeatedly that no one would lose their homes because of the pandemic. Clearly, they lied."
The new rules take effect from Monday, when the latest extension to the ban takes over. Landlords have long lobbied ministers to end the ban, claiming it harms their business and is causing tenants to build up more arrears.
The new extension, which as announced just three days before the current ban was due to expire, runs until February 21 in England. Ministers say it will be kept under review.
Separate bans are in place in Scotland and Wales with different conditions. In both nations, where housing is a devolved issue, the eviction ban is expected to run until at least the end of March. Rules in Northern Ireland requiring landlords to give 12 weeks notice before moving to eviction proceedings have also been extended to March.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government did not respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.
Read More
Ministers urged to reintroduce eviction ban as England enters lockdown.
What about the fisheries sale out.
Check the facts. Buffoon Boris, king of the Muppets swore he had sorted it out. Had stood rigid and not only won the argument, but 'Improved' our standing and now much the betterment eh!

The virus problem and the means to deal with it and the fallout is no Walk in the Park.

It has thrown up numerous side  effects, landlords  for one, they have to pay the morgages on buy to let properties and depend on the rents to pay them, the tenants have to find the rent, no work  no rent available, landlord in trouble because he/she cannot pay the morgages on their properties and they are in trouble.

Just one of the problems of many financialy that the Government have  to deal with.

Personally cannot see how eviction can help anyone, however, it is only one of several such matters the Government have to deal with and going into matters not realy associated with the problem the virus poses I feel is counter productive, if one thinks the matter is ill dealt with OFFER SOMETHING BETTER.

Regards.

It has thrown up numerous side effects, landlords for one, they have to pay the mortgages on buy to let properties and depend on the rents to pay them, the tenants have to find the rent, no work no rent available, landlord in trouble because he/she cannot pay the mortgages on their properties and they are in trouble.

Well they have them frozen, like the tenants do/did. And will again.

Daughter bought another house to rent out. has no problems ... as of yet.
governments promises though of 'No Evictions' is going out the window!
Because the Home owners want 'Profit and not a status Quo.
Like most concerns they want the government to pay their' profits. Not their stabiliser of concerns.
Soon, Money lenders and businesses will demand 'Back Loses from Joe public. Who else!

A concern locks doors. no trade, then hardly any overheads. No profits, but government payments mean that they don't lose out.... just loss of profits.

But many 1000's are working scotch free hoping to keep their jobs later, via unscrupulous bosses. Yes doing 2-5 days payless, by the bosses still getting payments from the government.

The best thing the Government could do is do away with the buy to let.

The only reason many people cannot buy is because of the deposit needed to the lenders.

The actual rent they pay in many cases pays the morgage  for the landlord, so it is realy the tennant who is buying the property for  the landlord.

Their should only be affordable houses  built none of the second home stuff taking up the space where several houses could be built and all land should be bought by the Government that is applied for planning, it is the price farmers  etc; are asking for land that puts the prices up.

Regards.

Yes houses! Councils used to build them. Till thatcher enticed tenants to buy. Took the money paid for them and stole it laving the council no money to build more like before.

Then any money left at end of March is given to the government.

Would of loved to buy my house but deposit was the factor ..our rent has just gone up fro. 93 aweek to 100 ...not sure yet how will will manage but we will..............I hope

MISTY wrote:

The virus problem and the means to deal with it and the fallout is no Walk in the Park.

It has thrown up numerous side  effects, landlords  for one, they have to pay the morgages on buy to let properties and depend on the rents to pay them, the tenants have to find the rent, no work  no rent available, landlord in trouble because he/she cannot pay the morgages on their properties and they are in trouble.

Just one of the problems of many financialy that the Government have  to deal with.

Personally cannot see how eviction can help anyone, however, it is only one of several such matters the Government have to deal with and going into matters not realy associated with the problem the virus poses I feel is counter productive, if one thinks the matter is ill dealt with OFFER SOMETHING BETTER.

Regards.

Evictions help no one unfortunately from my perspective also Misty     in the climate we have these days etc. That being said thou if one desires to get a economy up & running again as such. Build, build, build every thing under the sun type of thing to house people like we do & have done here. Flow on effects have an enormous benefit to ones general society at the end of the day for what I have experienced down here over the years on average .

peel bros wrote:

Would of loved to buy my house but deposit was the factor ..our rent has just gone up fro. 93 aweek to 100 ...not sure yet how will will manage but we will..............I hope

50 odd years ago here Ray when I first started paying my house off etc with a Mortgage loan, I was actually paying 30 dollars a month   & then 40 years down track here would you believe, when I finely actually finished paying it all off at my leisure I was still only paying 30 dollars a month           . & take care.

At least it's yours though...I have paid I bet 90 000 in rent in 30 years if not more ..

best thing we ever did , buying our house .........no rent to pay, just gas / electric , food etc, i think council housing rents are around £90 - £95 per week here too ray.

only thing is if something needs repairing etc, we have to pay for it .