Statement from the RPRA

They obviously read our little site and it's comments.

Just hope they attempt to shut  me up.

Been waiting for the  hypocrits to be exposed.

Bring it on.

Think it is also allied to the   article I sent in which was not published, first one not published.

It was called, THE TRUTH THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.

Unfortunately, those up each others backsides do not like the truth, foreign to them.

Would love a real exposure of the whole set up.

Regards.

Not sure how it got on our site David ????????.

i think youve got the wrong end of the stick misty, i posted this on our forum, it is taken off the rpra facebook page........i posted it because it might have been of interest to our members .

by what ive read, the reason this was sent out is because an assault took place on a rpra employee .....

cant verify if this true or not .

David wrote:

by what ive read, the reason this was sent out is because an assault took place on a rpra employee .....

cant verify if this true or not .

No excuses if so David like or dislike the RPRA etc no employee there deserves that type of treatment I suggest.

No excuse and have no time for thugs.

Deserve all they get and usually do in the end.

We have our share been threatened myself a few times for making them 
adhere to the rules etc;.

As have many others  who have written for advice on how to deal with
threats including, to burn lofts down etc;.  

How they expected me to know when I had the same problem I know not.

Hope the culprit gets his/her come upance, and sympathy to the one on te receiving end.

Just thought it a coincidence with my article going in at the same time.

  
Regards.

In this weeks BHW David.

If it relates to any kind of unacceptable behaviour then I agree it needs attention, if it is to silence those who feel the RPRA is run by a set of selfish individuals without a clue on how to run the sport, ignored proffetional advice, paid for by the fanciers, on how to make things better and fairer, and think major changes should be made then, I would say, GET STUFFED.

Regards.

criticism of the running of things is not abuse is it but violence towards anyone is totally un-acceptable

true darren, it seems quite a lot of fanciers are becoming disgruntled with the rpra, but yet again there as just as many who have no problem with the rpra ....but either way we do have the right to speak up if we are not happy in some way .

My spellin is getting werse, just which knob do you have to press for it to tell you, you are wrong ?.

Regards.

Been looking all over David for any incident that may have occured to make them give out such a statement, cannot find one.

The article I sent in did not hold any punches and instead of trying to sort out those willing to break the most basic rules of decency they hob nob with them, which in my opinion makes THEM worse than the perpertrators.

Regards.

oldstrain wrote:

criticism of the running of things is not abuse is it but violence towards anyone is totally un-acceptable

We sadly live in a world of litigation these days etc in certain ways I suggest O/S unfortunately, so how one at times can/may interpret issues/comments can be classed as abuse, if one just so happens to be on the other end as such.

i did mean constructive criticism ,to me it would seem the managers hands are tied somewhat by other employees there and i would like to see him having more clout,the current managers background and experience in other ventures will stand him in good stead i believe ...lets hope so eh but to late for me to see any benefit but that does not mean i dont care about pigeon racing

Likewise oldstrain, been trying for over 50 years to change matters.

Would be tragic if future kids and others could not have the experience of being involved with our feathered friends in an appropriate and fair manner.

Unfortunately, until they get rid of the Old Brigade and those they have contaminated  matters will not improve, ( IN MY OPINION).

Would be revealing to know just how many actual participating lofts there are now.

Not the membership numbers but participants in club racing etc;

The turnover of General Managers etc; with regard to a cushy well paid position indicates  that they  were not impressed with the set up, nor were those Council members who wanted to look into the whole set up but were voted off in vote of no confidence, they had been voted on for just that purpose, can see no rule which allowed that to happen.

The only time the majority will become involved is when their ability to race is compramised, not too far ahead me thinks.

Regards.